Do Androids dream of freedom?
by hub, Monday 27 October 2008 at 18:05 :: Handhelds :: #636 :: rss
As I stated Android source code got released almost at the same time as the G1 HTC phone was released to "consumers". I welcomed it because the held their promises, even though, after looking a bit closely, it seems to contain binary blobs.
But the problem is still about Freedom.
One would have thought that Google would have thought differently, but they don't. First the phone availability: the phone is only available from a single carrier from a single country, with a 2 year contract attached. Also the phone is apparently not hackable: there don't seem to be a way to upload a custom firmware image. Not so open as other write.
Disclaimer: As you have understood now, I don't have such a phone. See reason above. Even if it was available through the monopolistic GSM carrier here I'd not have it as they'd surely require a 3-years contract which is a no go.
Also the phone require a Google ID. Not that it is hard to come by or that it is another money pit, but the requirement is awkward, seem unnecessary and raise some privacy concerns, or some red flag about tying feature of the phone to Google application hosting.
So what do we have left?
Nothing much. At least you can upload any application you wish, and you are not at the mercy of a vendor that decide life or death on your application... but there is still a kill-switch. Said application is also written with Android own toolkit in its own language and sandbox, making it hard to port anything from an existing application[1]. And that's it. Not a huge step for the Freedom to tinker.
Notes
[1] rumors said that it is compatible with the Java language
Comments
Monday 27 October 2008 19:11, by joe :: #
Monday 27 October 2008 19:48, by hub :: #
Monday 27 October 2008 20:59, by Sandy :: site :: #
Monday 27 October 2008 21:20, by rusty :: #
Monday 27 October 2008 21:35, by foo :: #
Monday 27 October 2008 22:33, by js0n :: #
Monday 27 October 2008 22:33, by hub :: #
Tuesday 28 October 2008 00:40, by Andrew Clunis :: site :: #
Tuesday 28 October 2008 00:43, by Stormy :: site :: #
Tuesday 28 October 2008 05:22, by Benjamin Otte :: #
Tuesday 28 October 2008 11:12, by nim :: #
Tuesday 28 October 2008 12:22, by Karl Lattimer :: site :: #
Tuesday 28 October 2008 13:09, by hub :: #
Tuesday 28 October 2008 13:49, by Ian McKellar :: site :: #
Tuesday 28 October 2008 14:15, by Adam Williamson :: site :: #
Tuesday 28 October 2008 14:36, by hub :: #
Thursday 30 October 2008 07:20, by Dalibor Topic :: site :: #
Post a comment
Comments are closed.