Loud ramblings of a Software Artisan

Sunday 16 April 2006

AbiWord 2.4.4

AbiWord 2.4.4 has been released. This time there are binaries for MacOS X 10.2 (and up) on PowerPC. Unfortunately the equation support is broken on Mac in this version. I hope to have a new build soon for that.

Release Notes, Changelog, Download

About AbiWord on Intel Mac, there is at the moment no official build planned as none of the developers has an Intel-based Mac. There is no reason it wouldn't work, but the dependencies have to be rebuilt as well. I have requested Apple, thought ADC, a loan of an Intel machine for that, but no reply so far.

Desktop scripting

I was thinking the other day about desktop application scripting. Scripting the desktop is basically high-level application programming, controlling third party applications. Real world examples include AppleScript on MacOS X and whatever MS Windows have. Also GreaseMonkey in Mozilla is a good example of internal application scripting.

How I think this should be implemented.

First: security. Security is the first major concern that should be a very strong requirement. Don't let security issues plague that, we have seen what it does on other operating system.

Second: it should be universal provided that the application provides the necessary hooks. And that universality should be cross desktop.

Third: it should be language independent with a sane default. And for that I'm thinking JavaScript. Why JavaScript? Because it is know by a lot of end user, as it is being used for webdesign, and some other world application like Photoshop use it as a base scripting engine. At least it make more sense by default than say Python or Perl. That language independence would also provide a way to implement said Python and Perl if desired. The idea of using JavaScript came from an article by Philip Greenspun on how to automate preparation of images for the web, which give a practical quick insight of what can be achieved inside an application. Note that scripting inside and scripting outside are 2 different things, but all you can do from outside could be done from inside.

But let's talk about the details:

There is a work to be done architecture-wise to achieve this properly. First let's not make the mistakes of previous implementations. For what I know, Apple initial implementation os AppleScript in System 7.1, in fact of OSA (Open Scripting Architecture) had 2 big flaws: it was complex to implement API-wise, and it was slow as hell.

Here is the architecture I think of, largely inspired by Apple's (designed 15 years ago):

All the dirty work would be done within the scripting engine. It is the interface between the language and the IPC mechanism, and it implements the scripting protocol. The scripting interface will arbitrate, allowing to control several applications from one single script. The IPC mechanism could be DBus, DCOP or whatever suitable. And ORB might do it too. In fact the only required to be unique mechanism would be the way for the application to register itself with the scripting interface. Converging to a unique IPC mechanism would be prefered, but the cross-desktop nature of the interface might not give the choice.

What do people think about it?