Diary of a CrazyFrench

Wednesday 30 March 2011

CRTC, a useless regulator

In Canada the CRTC regulate telecommunications and broadcasting - sector that is really lagging behind - more on than another time. It is also the body in charge of making sure political candidates have equal time.

Right now, in Canada, it is election period to elect the 41st parliament after the 40th was disolved last week. The Green Party of Canada has been denied to participate into the debate by a "broadcasting consortium" because of an unwritten rule blocking parties that don't have a seat in the House of Common. Mr Ignatieff (Liberal), Mr Layton (NDP) and Monsieur Duceppe (Bloc Qu├ębecois) all agreed that she should participate in the debate. Mr Harper (Conservative) just said it was up to the "consortium". This is a bit of a change as both Mr Harper and Mr Layton threatened to boycott the debate if she was invited in 2008.

Simple facts: in the 2008, the Green Party of Canada gathered 6.8% of the votes nation wide. They didn't get a single member elected. In 2011, for this election, they have 308 candidates, ie one candidate per ridding. She also did participate in the 2008 debate as she gained a seat prior the election call.

Now concerning the refusal from the "broadcasting consortium", the Green Party contacted them. One single quote of the answer:

No rebuttal, only explaining they had the right to make the decision and it was their airways.

Broadcasters don't own the air waves. They license them from the regulator, the CRTC. Is it a private company that decide who can debate? Let's get in touch with the CRTC, and here is their response verbatim:

Thank you for taking the time to contact the CRTC regarding the participation of the Green Party in upcoming election debates.

Broadcasters remain ultimately responsible for the choice, content and scheduling of all material they choose to broadcast, subject to policies and regulations. While the CRTC has election policies in regard to advertising and balanced coverage during an election period, the CRTC does not become actively involved in the actual determination of which particular political parties participate in debates.

Here are links to our fact sheet and circular containing general information on Election Campaigns and Political Advertising:

http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/INFO_SHT/b309.htm

http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2011/2011-218.htm

In short, they will do nothing. They don't consider it is up to them to ensure balanced coverage by ruling on this. This probably part of a streak of bad decisions taken by the CRTC in the last years that just make me believe that this organisation should be disbanded and recreated from scratch.

In the mean time I have contacted elections Canada and filed a complaint as well.

Some would argue that other parties like the Pirate Party of Canada should also be invited. Why not.

Disclaimer: I'm not registered with any of the parties involved in the election nor am I a registered voter due to lack of citizenship. I don't think I would vote for the Green Party of Canada in this election either if I could, but I do believe in the democratic process, and balanced coverage.

Further coverage:

Saturday 26 March 2011

About libraries

Read somewhere on the interweb:

Library code is ugly because it cannot use global variables. Libraries are more difficult to modify, build, install, and test than standalone programs, and so are inappropriate for file formats that change every day.

The result is just full of global variables that get changed here or there, making a function behaviour totally change. And when it comes to adding a new file format? If you are lucky, it will easy. If not, good luck.

File this in the "DON'T" folder.

Wednesday 9 March 2011

Chinatown

Food shopping in Vancouver chinatown on E Pender. Taken during the Vancouver 3/4 photowalk. Vancouver, BC - March 5th 2011

Kodak Ektar 100, Mamiya C-220, Mamiya Sekkor 105mm f3.5 1/60 f8

flickr

Thursday 3 March 2011

Apache mis-hap

I was playing with some Apache/PHP stuff and I was wondering why http://www.example/foo/ did work when I only have foo.php and when I disable my Apache rewrite rules. Worse, it actually scrap all the query parameters as well.

The answer ? MultiViews

I found the answer using Google after some head scratching about why this was happening and was wondering what that option was doing. It was enabled by default.