Google did shutdown Reader, their feed aggregator. Speculation is that it is to promote the use of the proprietary publishing silo that is Google+, and I'm not saying as a Google+ grudge I might hold, I actually believe it might be one of the considerations.

Imagine a second if all the content was pushed exclusively to a popular silo like Twitter, Facebook and Google+: it would be confined to these environments and people wouldn't be able to aggregate elsewhere. Now what if one of these hugely popular silos disappeared. It has happened, it can happen again, I have numerous examples. And I am still look for the Google+ or Facebook feeds, while it is clear that Twitter already removed them.

With RSS[1] all we need is a different aggregator to pull the feed. It would still work. And that's what happening with Google Reader user base: they are moving to other platforms that offer the same feature, either web based, or using desktop software.

Let's have this a learning step and continue to focusing on open standards for publishing. Let's continue to provide feeds. Let's continue to request feeds. And more importantly, us software hackers, let's continue to provide awesome libre software to do the job and on which we can reliably build upon.


[1] this include ATOM and other variation of feed publishing based on open standards